Key Points
- India reacts to Trudeau’s admission about the lack of hard evidence in Nijjar’s murder.
- Trudeau linked the killing to Indian agents but admitted there’s no concrete proof.
- India’s MEA spokesperson rejected the allegations, stressing the need for real evidence.
- Trudeau had previously claimed there was credible evidence against India.
Looma News
Things are getting tense between India and Canada. After Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s recent comments about Hardeep Singh Nijjar’s murder, India has made its position clear. During a public inquiry, Trudeau confessed he didn’t have hard evidence to support his claims about Indian involvement in Nijjar’s killing, which has set off a strong reaction from Indian officials.
In a press conference, MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal addressed the issue head-on, pointing out that despite Trudeau’s serious accusations against Indian diplomats, Canada hasn’t provided any evidence to back those claims. Jaiswal emphasized that India firmly rejects these allegations and highlighted the importance of credible proof in such serious matters.
Initially, Trudeau had stated there was “credible evidence” linking India to the murder, but he later described the basis for his claims as mostly intelligence rather than hard facts. This shift has raised eyebrows and added more strain to diplomatic relations between the two countries.
As per current situation , it’s clear both sides are standing their ground. The demand for solid proof from Canada is now a key issue, showing just how complicated international relations can get and the ongoing debates over accountability and transparency.
